The UN membership roster contains 54 African states, and that of the African Union contains 53. While the AU list includes suspended members, it does not include a count for Morocco, who has decided to stay out of the AU. Thus AU’s implied total can also be said to be 54. Of these, 48 states are found on the actual continent, while 6 are island nations.
However, Africa is about to get a brand new country. Within less than two weeks, South Sudan will hold a referendum on whether or not to secede from the rest of Sudan. If it does secede, which currently seems likely, it would mean that the new total will soon be 55, right? Well, no, because the current total of 54 is true only to some degree.
Before I go on: what’s a country, anyway? I’m going to be somewhat untechnical here and use ‘country’, ‘nation’ and ‘state’ pretty much interchangeably. More precisely, I’ll count as a country any defined territory with a sovereign and accepted (or at least obeyed) government/leadership, a seemingly stable and functioning governing infrastructure, plus a set of recognised and enforced laws by which the territory is governed.
So how many are there, then?
53 or 54 = official totals
For a long time, the standard answer has been either 53 or 54, depending on whether one counts the Sahrawi Republic or West Sahara as a country or not. The Sahrawi Republic was briefly independent in the 1970s, but has since then been controlled by Morocco, who currently occupies roughly three quarters of the entire Sahrawian territory. There have been negotiations and plans for either full independence (demanded by the Sahrawi leadership) or merely some degree of autonomy (the Moroccan standpoint). But nothing seems to be happening. Nonetheless, the Sahrawi Republic is recognised as a country by many other countries, as well as the UN and the AU, both of whom have accepted the Sahrawi Republic as a member state (which, incidentally, is also the reason why Morocco refuses to be a member of the AU).
Either way, the current official total of 54 (or 53 if you’re Morocco) is not the full story, irrespective of how one counts Sahrawi. Both numbers have in fact been obsolete for many years due to the break-up of Somalia in the 1990s.
56 (or 57) = another total
As has been widely reported in news bulletins for several years now, Somalia broke up during the 1990s. Yet most international bodies, such as the UN and the AU, still regard and count Somalia as a single country, with its recognised successor being the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia seated at Mogadishu.
However, the Transitional Federal Government governs only small parts of what used to be Somalia. Other parts of the territory are controlled by others, such as Somaliland and Puntland, two unrecognised countries with fully functioning governments and administrations. In most respects, they look very much like regular countries, except they lack international recognition. Nonetheless, there is no reason not to count Somaliland and Puntland as de facto countries, since they act as sovereign polities independently of the Transitional Federal Government. Other putative states have either dissolved (as did the Northland State), been overtaken by others (e.g. Maakhir overtaken by Puntland and Jubaland overtaken by al-Shabaab; see below), or have recognised the authority of the Transitional Federal Government (as has Galmudug).
As the fight for some areas is still ongoing, it is difficult to make a reasoned assessment about the entire territory of former Somalia, let alone its future. This concerns in particular the southern parts, an area that is currently controlled by al-Shabaab, an organisation or movement labelled “terrorists” by some Western analysts. While Somaliland and Puntland can be counted as de facto sovereign countries, the al-Shabaab-controlled territory appears less like a functioning country. Be that as it may, the area is at least independently ruled, even though the political infrastructure seems less clear and formalised than we’d normally expect of a country. Still, I suppose it could potentially be counted as a “country” (of some sort) bringing the total to a possible 57.
57 (or 58) = current de facto total
As mentioned above, the current total, whatever one considers it to be, will soon be added with a new member, namely, South Sudan. At the moment, South Sudan has the same status as Somaliland and Puntland. That is, it is a sovereign territory with its own government and administration, albeit lacking proper international recognition. So even if it were not to achieve independence, we could still count it as a de facto African country.
Hence with South Sudan, be it recognised or not, we reach a total of 57 de facto African countries (or 58 if al-Shabaab were to be included).
63 (or even 64) = other potential totals
To most of the totals above, we could potentially add another six, namely, Spain, France, the UK, Portugal, Malta, and Yemen. Each of these countries rule over territories that lie on the African Tectonic Plate.
Spain controls Spanish North Africa and the Canary Islands. Spanish North Africa is the only European-controlled area on the mainland of Africa and consists of the cities Ceuta and Melilla, plus a scattering of tiny islands just outside the Moroccan coast. The areas have been claimed by Morocco, but Spain has persistently refused. France controls Réunion, Mayotte and a small number of uninhabited islands around Madagascar. The UK controls the island territories of St Helena, Ascension & Tristan da Cunha. Portugal controls Madeira, with surrounding small(er) islands. Yemen controls Soqotra, an island just outside the Horn of Africa. And finally, the entire country of Malta lies on the African Plate, even though by tradition it is and has been counted as European.
The territories in question are all governed independently of (other) African countries. They are demarkated on maps by (inter)national borders. However, the governments that rule them are seated outside Africa, either Europe (Spain, France, UK, Portugal, Malta) or Asia (Yemen). Still, the respective territories are geographically African, and therefore the countries that rule them could be counted as African. Were we to do so, the total would run up to 63 (or 64 with al-Shabaab).
Summary
In sum, then, the current total of de facto African countries is at least 57, which includes the unproblematic 53 plus Sahrawi, Somaliland, Puntland, and South Sudan. Of these, Sahrawi enjoyes international recognition and South Sudan is likely to do so soon. The total of 57 could potentially be boosted to 58 if we were to regard the al-Shabaab-controlled areas as constituting a country.
To either of these two totals, we can then make six further additions consisting of areas controlled by non-African governments, giving us a potential grand total of either 63 or 64.
| recognised: | 54 | = The Official 54, incl. 48 mainland and 6 island nations | |
| de facto: | 57 | = The Official 54 plus South Sudan, Somaliland, Puntland | |
| ( 58 if al-Shabaab is included ) | |||
| potential: | 63 | = The above 57 plus Spain, France, the UK, Portugal, Malta, Yemen | |
| ( 64 if al-Shabaab is included ) |
Personally, I’m going with 57.
jfmaho said,
Thursday, February 3, 2011 at 18:48
And here is a list of all the countries in Africa (not counting al-Shabaab-controlled areas):
mark said,
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 16:48
nigeria get ready for division
Godson GEORGE said,
Tuesday, June 14, 2011 at 10:58
I suggest the non African countries such as Spain, France Portugal to be added to Africa, irrespective of they been govern by the Europeans,
Geographically the belong to Africa not even an Island but a Mainland in Africa so why the DIVISION. If not done, it will affect the future as any country in Africa reaching a fully developed state will likely to part themselves also.
jfmaho said,
Tuesday, June 14, 2011 at 15:35
Do you mean they should be made independent of their European governments? If so, that might prove difficult.
There was a referendum in the 1970s in Mayotte, for instance, in which the population clearly decided that they wish to remain under French control. The alternative was to be made part of the Comoros.
The Spanish North African territories have been under Spanish control since the 16th century, so the population there considers themselves genuinely Spanish, not Moroccan. In fact, the areas in question have never been part of Morocco, not even the Moroccan Empire.
So if they they were made either independent or part of existing African countries, it would be against the wishes of the people.
Elev said,
Thursday, July 7, 2011 at 0:03
google.se annars
Afisility said,
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 17:47
Google neva sure of the total number of africa country.
desmond J said,
Monday, October 17, 2011 at 8:13
Division of Nigerians will leads to shedding of blood and this isn’t the solution but leadership problems. Nigeria is one till HE comes
Ahmed noor said,
Sunday, November 6, 2011 at 20:34
There is same country u missing whate about ogadenia? Is a country in africa beetwen somalia and eithopia try to knw that country a.u and african union must remember that cntry
NYC African food from Mali, Madagascar, Sudan, Tanzania, Chad | United Nations of Food (NYC) said,
Monday, December 12, 2011 at 3:55
[...] love good African food, but the continent is home to a crapload of individual countries—54 or so, depending on whose list you’re looking at—and there’s a relative shortage of African restaurants in NYC. Until now, I’ve only been able [...]
Viands Shajara » Maps said,
Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 4:09
[...] that note, I decided to google “How Many Countries are in Africa?” and found the total depends on several factors. There are segments of Africa that consider [...]
Ememerurai Jeho Uzezi said,
Saturday, February 4, 2012 at 8:16
Thanks for the information I had from this write up for answering my questions.
Bobby said,
Thursday, February 16, 2012 at 8:26
What about Biafra
jfmaho said,
Sunday, February 19, 2012 at 12:59
I can’t see Biafra qualifying as a country. It briefly claimed independence in the late 1960s, but has since been a functioning part of Nigeria.
GORSI LEKIA FRANCE said,
Friday, March 9, 2012 at 22:25
For a territory to be called a country, it most be :Independent,sovereign,government. And these are bases of gaining international recognition.So my opinion is that the assesment of UN should be regarded.which is 54 plus south sudan 55. In summary, from now onward I shall profess the number of African countries as 55 till any other independent is officially pronounced. Thanks!
jfmaho said,
Saturday, March 10, 2012 at 0:16
It’s perfectly reasonable to follow the UN count.
However, both Somaliland and Puntland are independent and sovereign, even though they’re not recognised. The UN expects Somalia to reform as it once was. Hence they are reluctant to recognise any “break-away” territories. Personally, I don’t think it’s likely, at least not as far as Somaliland is concerned. Puntland may join Somalia in the future, if past pronouncements are still valid whenever Somalia becomes a functioning country again. Somaliland have said they intend to stay independent.
But then again, the future of Somalia seems pretty unpredictable, so who knows what’ll happen.
Amnesty world said,
Friday, March 16, 2012 at 20:28
Biafra will make it 55